Since 1986 we have proudly served the Real Estate Community, Attorneys and the Public with our expert Process Serving, Loan Signing and general Notary Public services in Los Angeles and Orange Counties.
"Our mission is to serve Attorneys, the Real Estate Community and the public with the best service possible. We are diligent and willing to go the distance to get the job done quickly, correctly and to our clients exact specifications."
Most Local Mobile Notary Jobs are $25.00 and that includes 2 signatures. Most Local Process Serving Jobs are $45.00 and that includes 3 attempts.
Please contact us for an appointment and quote.
3109 S. Kerckhoff Ave., San Pedro, CA 90731 65 Pine Avenue, #804, Long Beach, CA 90802 Phone 310-480-0993 Fax 310-547-4913 e-mail HopePeck@aol.com
Now Offering Authentication and Full Apostille Services for Documents that Must Meet Notorial Standards of Legal Documents Going Outside of the U.S.
Member of the National Association of Professional Process Servers
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/1/0/30/11/30989/user/31629/htdocs/rss_reader.php on line 119
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/1/0/30/11/30989/user/31629/htdocs/rss_reader.php on line 119
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /data/1/0/30/11/30989/user/31629/htdocs/rss_reader.php on line 119
Latest Top (5) News
Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins., Co. v. Bezich (U.S. 7th Cir., Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Contracts, Insurance Law, Securities Law) A petition for permission to appeal, arising from the district court's remand of plaintiff's class action lawsuit against an insurer for breach of contract claims on the basis that CAFA's exception to federal jurisdiction for the action applied, is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as plaintiff's claim "related to the rights, duties,...and obligations relating to or created by or pursuant to...a security," as defined in the Securities Act of 1933.
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 20:00:05 PDT Brown v. Kelly (U.S. 2d Cir., Civil Procedure, Civil Rights, Class Actions, Criminal Law & Procedure) In a class action by persons allegedly arrested pursuant to an unconstitutional New York anti-begging statute, the district court's class certification order is affirmed in part where the citywide plaintiff class met the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(3). However, the order is reversed in part where the district court erred in certifying a statewide defendant class because the defendant class representatives did not meet the adequacy and typicality requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a), and the district court also erred in certifying a statewide plaintiff class because the certification of this class was contingent on the bilateral certification of both a statewide plaintiff and a statewide defendant class.
Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:00:05 PDT Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Assoc. Inc. (Cal. App., Civil Procedure, Class Actions, Labor & Employment Law) In a suit brought by about 4000 current and former employees against an employer, claiming that the company, which provides security guard services throughout Southern California, denied meal and rest breaks and failed to pay for overtime, trial court's denial of their motion for class certification is affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded where: 1) order denying the motion for class certification as to the meal break class and the rest break class is affirmed as the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding common issues of law and fact did not predominate over individual issues; and 2) order denying the motion for class certification as to the overtime-pay class is reversed and remanded.
Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:00:05 PDT Anderson v. Bayer Corp. (U.S. 7th Cir., Class Actions, Drugs & Biotech, Injury And Tort Law, Product Liability) In a suit for personal injuries caused by Trasylol, a prescription medication manufactured by Bayer, defendants' petition for leave to appeal under 28 U.S.C. section 1453(c) of a district court's order remanding four of the five cases is denied for lack of jurisdiction as the district court properly concluded that the four cases were not "mass" actions under CAFA.
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 20:00:05 PDT In re: Wilborn (U.S. 5th Cir., Bankruptcy Law, Civil Procedure, Class Actions) In an interlocutory appeal from a bankruptcy court's certification of a class action in an adversary proceeding, the order is vacated where a bankruptcy judge may certify a class of debtors under appropriate circumstances but the proposed class in this case did not satisfy the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and Federal Bankruptcy Rule of Procedure 7023.
